Need /24 (arin) asap

Mon Jun 11 16:50:55 UTC 2018

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 9:27 AM, Michael Crapse <michael at wi-fiber.io> wrote:

> For an eyeball network, you cannot count on an IPv6 only network. Because
> all of your "customers" will complain because they can't get to hulu, or
> any other ipv4 only eyeball service. You still need the ipv4s to operate a
> proper network, and good luck figuring out which services are blacklisting
> your new /24 because the ipv4 space used to be a VPN provider, and the "in"
> thing to do for these services is to block VPNs.
>

There are many IPv6-only eyeball networks.  Definitely many examples in
wireless (T-Mobile, Sprint, BT ) and wireline (DT with DS-Lite in Germany,
Orange Poland ...) and even more where IPv4 NAT44 + IPv6 is used.  Just
saying, having ipv6 hedges a lot of risk associate with blacklisting and
translation related overhead and potentially scale and cost of IPv4
addresses.

>
>
> On 11 June 2018 at 09:21, Ca By <cb.list6 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 8:43 AM Stan Ouchakov <stano at imaginesoftware.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Can anyone recommend transfer market brokers for ipv4 addresses? Need
>> > clean /24 asap. ARIN's waiting list is too long...
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> >
>> > -Stan
>> >
>> > Meanwhile, FB reports that 75% of mobiles in the USA reach them via ipv6
>>
>> https://code.facebook.com/posts/635039943508824/how-ipv6-
>> deployment-is-growing-in-u-s-and-other-countries/
>>
>>
>> And Akaimai reports 80% of mobiles
>>
>> https://blogs.akamai.com/2018/06/six-years-since-world-ipv6-
>> launch-entering-the-majority-phases.html
>>
>>
>> And they both report ipv6 is faster / better.
>>
>
>