Should ISP block child pornography?

Fri Dec 7 09:14:16 UTC 2018

How is it that Interpol isn’t taking over/shutting down these domains in the DNS at the registry/registrar level?

The GAC pushed hard for the provisions that allow them to do so and there’s a pretty clear (and quick) process for it.

Owen

> On Dec 6, 2018, at 22:06 , Lotia, Pratik M <Pratik.Lotia at charter.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello all, was curious to know the community’s opinion on whether an ISP should block domains hosting CPE (child pornography exploitation) content? Interpol has a ‘worst-of’ list which contains such domains and it wants ISPs to block it.
> On one side we want the ISP to not do any kind of censorship or inspection of customer traffic (customers are paying for pipes – not for filtered pipes), on the other side morals/ethics come into play. Keep in mind that if an ISP is blocking it would mean that it is also logging the information (source IP) and law agencies might be wanting access to it.
>  
> Wondering if any operator is actively doing it or has ever considered doing it?
>  
> Thanks.
>  
>  
> With Gratitude,
>  
> Pratik Lotia      
>  
> “Information is not knowledge.”
> The contents of this e-mail message and 
> any attachments are intended solely for the 
> addressee(s) and may contain confidential 
> and/or legally privileged information. If you
> are not the intended recipient of this message
> or if this message has been addressed to you 
> in error, please immediately alert the sender
> by reply e-mail and then delete this message 
> and any attachments. If you are not the 
> intended recipient, you are notified that 
> any use, dissemination, distribution, copying,
> or storage of this message or any attachment 
> is strictly prohibited.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20181207/8c288c58/attachment.html>