AS36040 Prefix Limits
nanog at ics-il.net
Thu Oct 19 13:17:33 CST 2017
It is in conjunction with a route server. The filtering I meant would be that network A wants the IX to drop all advertisements to them from network B. Normally solved by network B putting a community on their routes to not advertise to network A, but network B doesn't want to do one-off configs.
Intelligent Computing Solutions
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andy Davidson" <andy at nosignal.org>
To: "Mike Hammett" <nanog at ics-il.net>
Cc: "NANOG list" <nanog at nanog.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 1:20:08 AM
Subject: Re: AS36040 Prefix Limits
On 18/10/2017, 18:39, Mike Hammett <nanog at ics-il.net> wrote:
> I am looking for someone that can speak authoritatively regarding AS36040's
> ability to change their own prefix limits, prefix filtering, etc.
> My current contact is advising the IX to do the filtering for them, which
> is not something IXes should be doing.
Unless this is in conjunction with a multilateral peering session (“route-server”), when prefix-filtering is something that the IXP very much should be doing.
More information about the NANOG