Multicom Hijacks: Do you peer with these turkeys (AS35916)?

Rich Kulawiec rsk at
Thu Aug 3 12:56:30 UTC 2017

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 02:52:43AM -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> And of course, Mr. Stanciu's snowshoe spamming domains would not be
> maximally productive unless they each had SPF TXT records attached [...]

FYI, 85 of the 101 domains listed here are have been picked up by various
spammer domain detection methods in place here.  I have no doubt that
the other 16 either will be in due course or simply reflect an inadequacy
in my methods.


More information about the NANOG mailing list