Interconnection Track
Martin Hannigan
hannigan at gmail.com
Sat Apr 1 23:59:20 UTC 2017
Hi Mehmet,
*Great effort here. +1.*
I'd suggest that you bring new faces to the game. New ideas are needed.
Topic wise:
- 'inside' settlement free peering
- Content vs. Network Operators, and right sizing where the traffic comes
from
- Once and for all: Are IXP's as dead as some say?
Hope that helps.
Best,
-M<
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Mehmet Akcin <mehmet at akcin.net> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As promised few months ago publically I have volunteered to bring together
> content to have Peering Track back to agenda. Now called "Interconnection
> Track"
>
> I would like to ask those who will attend, have attended in person in the
> past or those who have organized similar events to chime in and help
> suggest topics to cover in this 90 min session.
>
> I must say, Interconnection Track has been a major part if NANOG for many
> years. We have watched those who we consider as legends to discuss very
> important topics there.
>
> Please try to make your suggestion in order of importance for you as well
> as from community.
>
> I can try to do my best with help of few folks to bring this track back but
> you can help make it even better so please take a moment and send me your
> suggestions.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Mehmet
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list