Question on peering strategies

Max Tulyev maxtul at netassist.ua
Tue May 24 10:29:28 UTC 2016


I'm right here at RIPE 72 now, so I saw it of course ;)

The problem is not peering itself, but more general problem of filtering
nets, and it was told in the presentation.

On 24.05.16 13:19, Jared Mauch wrote:
> 
>> On May 24, 2016, at 6:11 AM, Max Tulyev <maxtul at netassist.ua> wrote:
>>
>> If you dig into hijacking topic more, you will see that hijacks through
>> Tier1 is same or even more popular than through IXes.
> 
> You may not have a view into that you’re being hijacked and used to send
> SPAM for example:
> 
> https://ripe72.ripe.net/presentations/45-Invisible_Hijacking.pdf
> 
> Their space was hijacked and announced facing Yahoo.  I’m hoping that
> Yahoo is now feeding public route views services as a method to help
> with detection.  Same goes for Microsoft and Google and other e-mail
> providers.  Some sunlight here would help avoid similar localized hijacks.
> 
>> And if someone want to make me a transit offer for the price of DE-CIX
>> (I do not even ask the price of DTEL-IX peering ;) ) - please, contact
>> me off-list, I will be really happy.
> 
> Pricing obviously varies based on location and a few other criteria, but
> you should be shopping if this is a major part of your business.
> 
> - Jared
> 



More information about the NANOG mailing list