/27 the new /24

Mike Hammett nanog at ics-il.net
Fri Oct 9 11:09:18 UTC 2015

Agreed. Often times people forget that budgets aren't unlimited and not everyone is in One Wilshire, 350 Cermak or 60 Hudson. 

Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Jason Baugher" <jason at thebaughers.com> 
To: "James Jun" <james at towardex.com> 
Cc: "NANOG" <nanog at nanog.org> 
Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2015 7:21:05 PM 
Subject: Re: /27 the new /24 

This thread, while originally interesting and helpful, seems to have 
degraded to a contest to see who can be the most arrogant, condescending 
and insulting. Congrats. 
On Oct 8, 2015 6:25 PM, "James Jun" <james at towardex.com> wrote: 

> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 03:45:38PM -0700, Mike wrote: 
> > 
> > NO, THERE IS NOT. We operate in rural and underserved areas and WE DO 
> > NOT HAVE realistic choices. Can you see me from your ivory tower? 
> Who is your upstream provider? 
> I think you're confused on how the IP transit industry works. 
> If you want choices in your transit providers, you should get a transport 
> circuit (dark, wave or EPL) to a nearby carrier hotel/data center. Once 
> you do that, you will suddenly find that virtually almost everyone in the 
> competitive IP transit market will provide you with dual-stacked IPv4/IPv6 
> service. 
> If you are buying DIA circuit from some $isp to your rural location that 
> you call "head-end" and are expecting to receive a competitive service, 
> and support for IPv6, well, then your expectations are either unreasonable, 
> ignorant or both. 
> Best, 
> James 

More information about the NANOG mailing list