/27 the new /24
nanog at ics-il.net
Fri Oct 9 11:09:18 UTC 2015
Agreed. Often times people forget that budgets aren't unlimited and not everyone is in One Wilshire, 350 Cermak or 60 Hudson.
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Baugher" <jason at thebaughers.com>
To: "James Jun" <james at towardex.com>
Cc: "NANOG" <nanog at nanog.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2015 7:21:05 PM
Subject: Re: /27 the new /24
This thread, while originally interesting and helpful, seems to have
degraded to a contest to see who can be the most arrogant, condescending
and insulting. Congrats.
On Oct 8, 2015 6:25 PM, "James Jun" <james at towardex.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 03:45:38PM -0700, Mike wrote:
> > NO, THERE IS NOT. We operate in rural and underserved areas and WE DO
> > NOT HAVE realistic choices. Can you see me from your ivory tower?
> Who is your upstream provider?
> I think you're confused on how the IP transit industry works.
> If you want choices in your transit providers, you should get a transport
> circuit (dark, wave or EPL) to a nearby carrier hotel/data center. Once
> you do that, you will suddenly find that virtually almost everyone in the
> competitive IP transit market will provide you with dual-stacked IPv4/IPv6
> If you are buying DIA circuit from some $isp to your rural location that
> you call "head-end" and are expecting to receive a competitive service,
> and support for IPv6, well, then your expectations are either unreasonable,
> ignorant or both.
More information about the NANOG