Getting hit hard by CHINANET
Roland Dobbins
rdobbins at arbor.net
Wed Mar 18 10:04:19 UTC 2015
On 18 Mar 2015, at 17:00, Roland Dobbins wrote:
> This is not an optimal approach, and most providers are unlikely to
> engage in such behavior due to its potential negative impact (I'm
> assuming you mean via S/RTBH and/or flowspec).
Here's one counterexample:
<https://ripe68.ripe.net/presentations/176-RIPE68_JSnijders_DDoS_Damage_Control.pdf>
-----------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list