Getting hit hard by CHINANET

Roland Dobbins rdobbins at arbor.net
Wed Mar 18 10:04:19 UTC 2015


On 18 Mar 2015, at 17:00, Roland Dobbins wrote:

> This is not an optimal approach, and most providers are unlikely to 
> engage in such behavior due to its potential negative impact (I'm 
> assuming you mean via S/RTBH and/or flowspec).

Here's one counterexample:

<https://ripe68.ripe.net/presentations/176-RIPE68_JSnijders_DDoS_Damage_Control.pdf>

-----------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net>


More information about the NANOG mailing list