PPPoE/IPoE, any recommendations for upgrade?

Mon Jun 8 06:16:32 UTC 2015

> On Sun, 7 Jun 2015, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> 
> > - If you are already using IPoE, tell more why should I upgrade?
> 
> The IPoE and IPoEoADSL I have done didn't need radius, didn't need BNG,
didn't
> need a lot of the complications you're talking about. It could basically
be realised in
> any decent L3 switch as default gateway for the customers instead of
needing BNG.
> 
> So I'd say if you want to get full potential of IPoE you need to do
simplification as
> well, otherwise there is little use in doing the work if he only thing you
want to
> change is from IPoPPPoE to IPoE encapsulation and keep all the other stuff
you're
> doing.
> 
> IPoPPPoE requires special CPE and router at your end to achieve high
speeds,
> because they need to support encapsulation/decapsulation of packets at
whatever
> speed you provide. The number of devices that do this is a lot smaller
than the
> ones that do decent speeds with just IPoE.
> 
> So some people will say migrating to IPoE from IPoPPPoE buys them nothing,
> because they feel they need all the mechanisms they currently use.
> Greenfield deployments might say "hey, we can do this without a lot of the
needed
> mechanisms for IPoPPPoE" and save a lot of money and complication.
> 
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se

Thanks for your reply. I'm would like this simplicity if I could keep same
functionalities I have in PPPoE. By functionalities I mean:
	- AAA 
	- Triple-ply services and classified accounting per service
	- Possibility to suspend a user service in case of over-quota
	- applying fair-share policies 

Do I have any option to have simplicity and same functionality together?

Regards,
Nasser
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6280 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20150608/581376c4/attachment.bin>