Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Mon May 5 07:34:01 UTC 2014


On Monday, May 05, 2014 09:27:37 AM Vitkovsk√Ĺ Adam wrote:

> You mean the SR right?

No, I mean:

	draft-george-mpls-ipv6-only-gap-05

The draft looks at issues that need to be fixed for MPLS to 
run in a single-stack IPv6 network.

Of course, there is other work that is looking at fixing 
LDPv6 as well, as you know.

At the recent MPLS SDN Congress in Paris, I asked some folk 
about leveraging SR to push native IPv6 support into MPLS, 
but they didn't seem like that was a key application yet. So 
while SR is promising, I think it's not a solution for this 
particular use-case yet.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140505/4eda1476/attachment.pgp>


More information about the NANOG mailing list