Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]
cgrundemann at gmail.com
Sat May 3 17:36:10 UTC 2014
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
> a good number of us use that kinky /10 behind home nats and encourage
> everyone to do so. it was a sick deal and should be treated as such,
> just more 1918.
A good number of folks use other folks IP space in all kinds of
strange and kinky ways too - it's ALL just more 1918, right??? Or
maybe standards exist for a reason. Perhaps enhancing coordination,
cooperation, and *interoperability* are good things... I'll let you
decide, Randy; is it sick to solve problems through community
consensus and standardization, or is it sick to be the one
intentionally getting in the way of those real world solutions?
More information about the NANOG