Survey on Internet Disputes.

Fredy Kuenzler kuenzler at init7.net
Mon Mar 24 09:23:50 UTC 2014


Am 23.03.2014 05:40, schrieb Kshitiz Verma:
> As claimed in http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~misra/news/CD070113.pdf , 
> 500 to 1000 de-peering happens on a daily basis today.

I suppose this is just by technical incapabilities. People leak
prefixes, hit max-pref limters, forget to clear sessions or don't bother
increasing limits, they migrate gear from Cisco to Brocade or Juniper
and cannot recover encrypted MD5 passwords... or management decisions
decide to pull from an exchange.

I don't consider this "de-peering" a peering dispute or an offensive
act. The majority of vanished BGP adjacencies are due to laziness or
technical limitations.

-- 
Fredy Kuenzler

Init7 (Switzerland) Ltd.
AS13030
St. Georgen-Strasse 70
CH-8400 Winterthur
Skype:   flyingpotato
Phone:   +41 44 315 4400
Fax:     +41 44 315 4401
Twitter: @init7 / @kuenzler
http://www.init7.net/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20140324/56b68ec6/attachment.bin>


More information about the NANOG mailing list