arin representation
John Curran
jcurran at arin.net
Mon Mar 24 03:35:59 UTC 2014
On Mar 23, 2014, at 6:53 PM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
> two questions:
>
> o of the /24s in the arin region, what percentage are owned by arin
> members?
Randy -
Happy to generate these - two questions for clarity.
1) Should we expand /16's and /8's into the corresponding number of /24's ?
(or do you only want those blocks issued originally as /24's to be counted)
2) In terms of categories, we could go strictly with /24's held by ARIN members
versus /24's held by non-members (and resulting percentages); note that would
be predominantly ISPs since end-users assignments from ARIN are unlikely to be
members unless they specifically opted to join. Alternatively, we could provide
counts /24's under RSA, /24's under LRSA, and /24's legacy-no-agreement as the
three categories of counts desired (and each percentage of the total)
So, based on above, would you prefer the /24 space statistics as asked
(member/non-member) or rsa/lrsa/legacy-no-agreement?
> o of the address holders in the arin region, what percentage are arin
> members?
Will do.
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
More information about the NANOG
mailing list