Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity

Valdis.Kletnieks at Valdis.Kletnieks at
Sat Jul 26 01:02:08 UTC 2014

On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:10:09 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian said:
> The debate is dominated by the parties of the first part unfortunately (and
> add professors of law to this already toxic mix)

So what you're saying is that the debate is in total violation of
RFC1925, section 4? :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 848 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <>

More information about the NANOG mailing list