Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity

Suresh Ramasubramanian ops.lists at
Sat Jul 26 01:10:16 UTC 2014

5 too. Agglutinating multiple separate problems into a single complex title
2 regulation solution

Enough hot air driven thrust is being generated to ensure porcine aviation
too, as section 3 assures us.
 On 26-Jul-2014 6:32 am, <Valdis.Kletnieks at> wrote:

> On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 06:10:09 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian said:
> > The debate is dominated by the parties of the first part unfortunately
> (and
> > add professors of law to this already toxic mix)
> So what you're saying is that the debate is in total violation of
> RFC1925, section 4? :)

More information about the NANOG mailing list