ARIN's RPKI Relying agreement

Bill Woodcock woody at pch.net
Thu Dec 4 15:51:31 UTC 2014


> On Dec 4, 2014, at 7:35 AM, Andrew Gallo <akg1330 at gmail.com> wrote:
> In my informal conversations, what I got was that lawyers read the agreement, said 'no, we wont sign it' and then dropped it.  If specific legal feedback isn't making it back to ARIN, then we need to start providing it,

All the specific legal feedback I’ve heard is that this is a liability nightmare, and that everyone wants ARIN to take on all the liability, but nobody wants to pay for it.  Are you hearing something more useful than that?

                                -Bill




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20141204/75775181/attachment.sig>


More information about the NANOG mailing list