Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

Derek Ivey derek at derekivey.com
Thu Mar 7 03:47:38 UTC 2013


I think your trace routes are just to their web servers. You need to figure out where the actual videos are being streamed from. I used the Developer Tools (Network tab) in Google Chrome to figure this out. The FQDNs will probably look like the ones in my trace routes. 

Derek

On Mar 6, 2013, at 10:38 PM, John Zettlemoyer <john at razorservers.com> wrote:

> I've been seeing the same thing and was thinking it was me.
> Just to add to some of the results here...
> 
> Verizon FIOS
>  1    32 ms     3 ms     5 ms  l100.cmdnnj-vfttp-27.verizon-gni.net [98.110.113.1]
>  2    33 ms     6 ms     7 ms  g0-3-3-7.cmdnnj-lcr-22.verizon-gni.net [130.81.183.186]
>  3    22 ms    22 ms    21 ms  xe-4-1-8-0.ny5030-bb-rtr2.verizon-gni.net [130.81.209.84]
>  4    22 ms    21 ms    21 ms  0.so-0-0-0.xt2.nyc4.alter.net [152.63.17.21]
>  5    58 ms    24 ms    24 ms  tengige0-5-4-0.gw8.nyc4.alter.net [152.63.18.206]
>  6     *       76 ms    76 ms  google-gw.customer.alter.net [152.179.72.62]
>  7    25 ms    21 ms    24 ms  209.85.255.68
>  8    21 ms    34 ms    34 ms  209.85.252.242
>  9    30 ms    28 ms    31 ms  209.85.249.11
> 10    31 ms    29 ms    29 ms  72.14.236.149
> 11    38 ms    36 ms    36 ms  72.14.238.173
> 12    31 ms    29 ms    31 ms  iad23s05-in-f8.1e100.net [74.125.228.8]
> 
> 
> Comcast
> 1    33 ms    15 ms    25 ms  68.38.220.1
> 2     8 ms    10 ms    15 ms  xe-11-3-0-0-sur01.burlington.nj.panjde.comcast.net [68.85.128.237]
> 3    10 ms     9 ms     9 ms  xe-13-0-0-0-ar03.audubon.nj.panjde.comcast.net [68.85.62.89]
> 4    14 ms    15 ms    15 ms  pos-3-6-0-0-cr01.ashburn.va.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.92.161]
> 5    15 ms    13 ms    14 ms  pos-0-0-0-0-pe01.ashburn.va.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.86.26]
> 6     *       23 ms    25 ms  75.149.231.62
> 7    17 ms    15 ms    14 ms  209.85.252.46
> 8    17 ms    16 ms    15 ms  72.14.238.173
> 9    17 ms    15 ms    16 ms  iad23s05-in-f8.1e100.net [74.125.228.8]
> 
> 
> Our datacenter
> 1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  static.razorinc.net [70.34.208.101]
> 2    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  70.34.251.9
> 3    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  xe-0-2-0.phi10.ip4.tinet.net [199.168.63.233]
> 4     2 ms     3 ms     2 ms  xe-7-2-1.was14.ip4.tinet.net [89.149.181.174]
> 5     3 ms     3 ms     3 ms  72.14.213.61
> 6     4 ms     4 ms     4 ms  216.239.46.248
> 7     5 ms     5 ms     5 ms  72.14.238.173
> 8     5 ms     5 ms     5 ms  iad23s05-in-f8.1e100.net [74.125.228.8]
> 
> 
> It would be nice if the ISPs and content providers could work out something when dealing with this much traffic and clearly needing to add capaicty. It's nice to dream too...
>  
> John
> 
> 





More information about the NANOG mailing list