Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling

John Zettlemoyer john at razorservers.com
Thu Mar 7 03:38:57 UTC 2013


I've been seeing the same thing and was thinking it was me.
Just to add to some of the results here...

Verizon FIOS
  1    32 ms     3 ms     5 ms  l100.cmdnnj-vfttp-27.verizon-gni.net [98.110.113.1]
  2    33 ms     6 ms     7 ms  g0-3-3-7.cmdnnj-lcr-22.verizon-gni.net [130.81.183.186]
  3    22 ms    22 ms    21 ms  xe-4-1-8-0.ny5030-bb-rtr2.verizon-gni.net [130.81.209.84]
  4    22 ms    21 ms    21 ms  0.so-0-0-0.xt2.nyc4.alter.net [152.63.17.21]
  5    58 ms    24 ms    24 ms  tengige0-5-4-0.gw8.nyc4.alter.net [152.63.18.206]
  6     *       76 ms    76 ms  google-gw.customer.alter.net [152.179.72.62]
  7    25 ms    21 ms    24 ms  209.85.255.68
  8    21 ms    34 ms    34 ms  209.85.252.242
  9    30 ms    28 ms    31 ms  209.85.249.11
 10    31 ms    29 ms    29 ms  72.14.236.149
 11    38 ms    36 ms    36 ms  72.14.238.173
 12    31 ms    29 ms    31 ms  iad23s05-in-f8.1e100.net [74.125.228.8]


Comcast
 1    33 ms    15 ms    25 ms  68.38.220.1
 2     8 ms    10 ms    15 ms  xe-11-3-0-0-sur01.burlington.nj.panjde.comcast.net [68.85.128.237]
 3    10 ms     9 ms     9 ms  xe-13-0-0-0-ar03.audubon.nj.panjde.comcast.net [68.85.62.89]
 4    14 ms    15 ms    15 ms  pos-3-6-0-0-cr01.ashburn.va.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.92.161]
 5    15 ms    13 ms    14 ms  pos-0-0-0-0-pe01.ashburn.va.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.86.26]
 6     *       23 ms    25 ms  75.149.231.62
 7    17 ms    15 ms    14 ms  209.85.252.46
 8    17 ms    16 ms    15 ms  72.14.238.173
 9    17 ms    15 ms    16 ms  iad23s05-in-f8.1e100.net [74.125.228.8]


Our datacenter
 1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  static.razorinc.net [70.34.208.101]
 2    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  70.34.251.9
 3    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  xe-0-2-0.phi10.ip4.tinet.net [199.168.63.233]
 4     2 ms     3 ms     2 ms  xe-7-2-1.was14.ip4.tinet.net [89.149.181.174]
 5     3 ms     3 ms     3 ms  72.14.213.61
 6     4 ms     4 ms     4 ms  216.239.46.248
 7     5 ms     5 ms     5 ms  72.14.238.173
 8     5 ms     5 ms     5 ms  iad23s05-in-f8.1e100.net [74.125.228.8]


It would be nice if the ISPs and content providers could work out something when dealing with this much traffic and clearly needing to add capaicty. It's nice to dream too...
 
John





More information about the NANOG mailing list