Time Warner Cable YouTube throttling
John Zettlemoyer
john at razorservers.com
Thu Mar 7 03:38:57 UTC 2013
I've been seeing the same thing and was thinking it was me.
Just to add to some of the results here...
Verizon FIOS
1 32 ms 3 ms 5 ms l100.cmdnnj-vfttp-27.verizon-gni.net [98.110.113.1]
2 33 ms 6 ms 7 ms g0-3-3-7.cmdnnj-lcr-22.verizon-gni.net [130.81.183.186]
3 22 ms 22 ms 21 ms xe-4-1-8-0.ny5030-bb-rtr2.verizon-gni.net [130.81.209.84]
4 22 ms 21 ms 21 ms 0.so-0-0-0.xt2.nyc4.alter.net [152.63.17.21]
5 58 ms 24 ms 24 ms tengige0-5-4-0.gw8.nyc4.alter.net [152.63.18.206]
6 * 76 ms 76 ms google-gw.customer.alter.net [152.179.72.62]
7 25 ms 21 ms 24 ms 209.85.255.68
8 21 ms 34 ms 34 ms 209.85.252.242
9 30 ms 28 ms 31 ms 209.85.249.11
10 31 ms 29 ms 29 ms 72.14.236.149
11 38 ms 36 ms 36 ms 72.14.238.173
12 31 ms 29 ms 31 ms iad23s05-in-f8.1e100.net [74.125.228.8]
Comcast
1 33 ms 15 ms 25 ms 68.38.220.1
2 8 ms 10 ms 15 ms xe-11-3-0-0-sur01.burlington.nj.panjde.comcast.net [68.85.128.237]
3 10 ms 9 ms 9 ms xe-13-0-0-0-ar03.audubon.nj.panjde.comcast.net [68.85.62.89]
4 14 ms 15 ms 15 ms pos-3-6-0-0-cr01.ashburn.va.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.92.161]
5 15 ms 13 ms 14 ms pos-0-0-0-0-pe01.ashburn.va.ibone.comcast.net [68.86.86.26]
6 * 23 ms 25 ms 75.149.231.62
7 17 ms 15 ms 14 ms 209.85.252.46
8 17 ms 16 ms 15 ms 72.14.238.173
9 17 ms 15 ms 16 ms iad23s05-in-f8.1e100.net [74.125.228.8]
Our datacenter
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms static.razorinc.net [70.34.208.101]
2 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 70.34.251.9
3 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms xe-0-2-0.phi10.ip4.tinet.net [199.168.63.233]
4 2 ms 3 ms 2 ms xe-7-2-1.was14.ip4.tinet.net [89.149.181.174]
5 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms 72.14.213.61
6 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms 216.239.46.248
7 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms 72.14.238.173
8 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms iad23s05-in-f8.1e100.net [74.125.228.8]
It would be nice if the ISPs and content providers could work out something when dealing with this much traffic and clearly needing to add capaicty. It's nice to dream too...
John
More information about the NANOG
mailing list