Anyone from frontiernet.net on here?

Wed Jul 10 04:18:56 UTC 2013

Thank you, I really appreciate you looking into this.  In return, I'll offer up that I'm a senior network engineer at Microsoft - if you ever have issues with AS8075, ping me, and I'll see what I can do.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Richmond [mailto:jeff.richmond at gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 8:36 PM
To: Warren Bailey
Cc: Janet Sullivan; nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: Anyone from frontiernet.net on here?

All it looks like I am seeing packet loss there across all of our peering sessions with them, so looks like a problem on their network. I'll ask our NOC to open up a ticket with them though just to see if we can find out what the issue is.

Thanks,
-Jeff

On Jul 9, 2013, at 7:18 PM, Warren Bailey <wbailey at satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote:

> There are some decent sized attacks taking place on gear near London, I believe. Could be a result of that?
> 
> 
> Sent from my Mobile Device.
> 
> 
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Janet Sullivan <janets at nairial.net>
> Date: 07/09/2013 5:01 PM (GMT-08:00)
> To: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Anyone from frontiernet.net on here?
> 
> 
> I've been seeing really bad packet loss between PCCW and frontier, and so far haven't been able to make any traction with anyone on either side.   I'm betting that the ??? is a peering point either in London or Ashburn.
> 
> uk.bgp4.net (0.0.0.0)                        Tue Jul  9 20:39:53 2013
> Keys:  Help   Display mode   Restart statistics   Order of fields   qu
> it                           Packets               Pings
> Host                      Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
> 1. 212.111.33.230          0.0%    43    1.7   0.7   0.5   1.8   0.3
> 2. 212.111.33.237          0.0%    43    2.3   1.9   1.1  22.7   3.3
> 3. 63.218.13.221           0.0%    43    2.3  15.6   1.1 230.3  45.9
> 4. ???
> 5. 74.40.2.173            23.3%    43  177.9 150.3 147.8 177.9   7.0
> 6. 74.40.2.193            20.9%    43  149.9 149.9 149.1 161.2   2.1
> 7. 74.40.3.241            18.6%    43  149.6 152.4 149.1 193.2   8.8
> 8. 74.40.5.49             28.6%    43  148.1 150.8 147.8 192.1   9.9
> 9. 74.40.5.54             26.2%    43  148.3 150.5 147.9 218.7  12.6
> 10. 74.40.5.46             33.3%    42  149.5 154.0 149.2 212.8  14.0
> 11. 74.40.3.137            16.7%    42  147.4 148.7 146.9 163.0   4.1
> 12. 74.40.1.154            29.3%    42  148.2 153.6 147.7 206.7  14.2
> 13. 50.34.2.162            35.7%    42  150.2 150.4 149.8 156.3   1.2
> 14. 50.46.150.55           26.2%    42  150.7 151.0 150.5 152.0   0.4
> 