Anyone from frontiernet.net on here?

Jeff Richmond jeff.richmond at gmail.com
Wed Jul 10 03:35:31 UTC 2013


All it looks like I am seeing packet loss there across all of our peering sessions with them, so looks like a problem on their network. I'll ask our NOC to open up a ticket with them though just to see if we can find out what the issue is.

Thanks,
-Jeff



On Jul 9, 2013, at 7:18 PM, Warren Bailey <wbailey at satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote:

> There are some decent sized attacks taking place on gear near London, I believe. Could be a result of that?
> 
> 
> Sent from my Mobile Device.
> 
> 
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Janet Sullivan <janets at nairial.net>
> Date: 07/09/2013 5:01 PM (GMT-08:00)
> To: nanog at nanog.org
> Subject: Anyone from frontiernet.net on here?
> 
> 
> I've been seeing really bad packet loss between PCCW and frontier, and so far haven't been able to make any traction with anyone on either side.   I'm betting that the ??? is a peering point either in London or Ashburn.
> 
> uk.bgp4.net (0.0.0.0)                        Tue Jul  9 20:39:53 2013
> Keys:  Help   Display mode   Restart statistics   Order of fields   qu
> it                           Packets               Pings
> Host                      Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
> 1. 212.111.33.230          0.0%    43    1.7   0.7   0.5   1.8   0.3
> 2. 212.111.33.237          0.0%    43    2.3   1.9   1.1  22.7   3.3
> 3. 63.218.13.221           0.0%    43    2.3  15.6   1.1 230.3  45.9
> 4. ???
> 5. 74.40.2.173            23.3%    43  177.9 150.3 147.8 177.9   7.0
> 6. 74.40.2.193            20.9%    43  149.9 149.9 149.1 161.2   2.1
> 7. 74.40.3.241            18.6%    43  149.6 152.4 149.1 193.2   8.8
> 8. 74.40.5.49             28.6%    43  148.1 150.8 147.8 192.1   9.9
> 9. 74.40.5.54             26.2%    43  148.3 150.5 147.9 218.7  12.6
> 10. 74.40.5.46             33.3%    42  149.5 154.0 149.2 212.8  14.0
> 11. 74.40.3.137            16.7%    42  147.4 148.7 146.9 163.0   4.1
> 12. 74.40.1.154            29.3%    42  148.2 153.6 147.7 206.7  14.2
> 13. 50.34.2.162            35.7%    42  150.2 150.4 149.8 156.3   1.2
> 14. 50.46.150.55           26.2%    42  150.7 151.0 150.5 152.0   0.4
> 





More information about the NANOG mailing list