Regarding smaller prefix for hijack protection
richard.barnes at gmail.com
Tue Sep 4 12:07:42 UTC 2012
This seems like an opportune time to remind people about RPKI-based
origin validation as a hijack mitigation:
I haven't run the numbers, but it seems like doing RPKI-based origin
validation is probably a lot cheaper than upgrading routers to store a
fully deaggregated route table :)
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Aftab Siddiqui
<aftab.siddiqui at gmail.com> wrote:
> The thing to acknowledge is that you've realized it otherwise if you follow
> the CIDR report than you will find bunch of arrogant folks/SPs not willing
> to understand the dilemma they are causing through de-aggregation.
> Aftab A. Siddiqui
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Anurag Bhatia <me at anuragbhatia.com> wrote:
>> I didn't realized the routing table size problem with /24's. Stupid me.
>> Thanks everyone for updates. Appreciate good answers.
More information about the NANOG