Regarding smaller prefix for hijack protection
aftab.siddiqui at gmail.com
Tue Sep 4 05:29:57 UTC 2012
The thing to acknowledge is that you've realized it otherwise if you follow
the CIDR report than you will find bunch of arrogant folks/SPs not willing
to understand the dilemma they are causing through de-aggregation.
Aftab A. Siddiqui
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Anurag Bhatia <me at anuragbhatia.com> wrote:
> I didn't realized the routing table size problem with /24's. Stupid me.
> Thanks everyone for updates. Appreciate good answers.
More information about the NANOG