Regarding smaller prefix for hijack protection

Aftab Siddiqui aftab.siddiqui at gmail.com
Tue Sep 4 00:29:57 CDT 2012


The thing to acknowledge is that you've realized it otherwise if you follow
the CIDR report than you will find bunch of arrogant folks/SPs not willing
to understand the dilemma they are causing through de-aggregation.

Regards,

Aftab A. Siddiqui


On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Anurag Bhatia <me at anuragbhatia.com> wrote:

> I didn't realized the routing table size problem with /24's. Stupid me.
>
>
>
> Thanks everyone for updates. Appreciate good answers.
>
>


More information about the NANOG mailing list