Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
Dobbins, Roland
rdobbins at arbor.net
Mon Nov 26 16:27:06 UTC 2012
On Nov 26, 2012, at 10:36 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
> Ipv6 is not important for users, it is important for network operators who want to sustain their business.
I agree with the first part; not sure I agree with the second part.
> Nope. Nobody will leave money on the table by alienating users.
I think it may be possible to make money with compelling IPv6-only content/services/applications.
> Apple and msft os' s now make a clear judgement on that. So, you need to update your perspective.
I'm not very interested in their judgement. So, I'm quite happy with my perspective, thanks.
> Does not matter. And it will not happen.
Proof by repeated assertion doesn't sway me.
> The better question, for an isp, is what kind of ipv4 secondary market budget do you have? How hot is your cgn running? Like ALGs much ? Security and attribute much ?
These are important, yes.
> Again , users dont care or know about v4 or v6. This is purely a network operator and app issue (cough cough ... skype).
It's my contention that IPv6 won't be widely deployed unless/until end-customers call up their ISPs demanding this 'IPv6 or whatever' thing they need to accomplish some goal they have.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
Luck is the residue of opportunity and design.
-- John Milton
More information about the NANOG
mailing list