Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration
Patrick W. Gilmore
patrick at ianai.net
Tue Nov 20 16:05:26 UTC 2012
On Nov 20, 2012, at 08:45 , Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> It is entirely possible that Google's numbers are artificially low for a number
> of reasons.
AMS-IX publishes stats too:
<https://stats.ams-ix.net/sflow/>
This is probably a better view of overall percentage on the Internet than a specific company's content. It shows order of 0.5%.
Why do you think Google's numbers are lower than the real total?
--
TTFN,
patrick
> On Nov 20, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Aaron Toponce <aaron.toponce at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:14:18AM +0100, Tomas Podermanski wrote:
>>> It seems that today is a "big day" for IPv6. It is the very first
>>> time when native IPv6 on google statistics
>>> (http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html) reached 1%. Some
>>> might say it is tremendous success after 16 years of deploying IPv6 :-)
>>
>> And given the rate on that graph, we'll hit 2% before year-end 2013.
>>
>> --
>> . o . o . o . . o o . . . o .
>> . . o . o o o . o . o o . . o
>> o o o . o . . o o o o . o o o
>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list