Big day for IPv6 - 1% native penetration

Tue Nov 20 15:23:34 UTC 2012

6to4 tunnels, no. 6in4 (such as tunnel broker), yes, those are part of the native count.

Owen

On Nov 20, 2012, at 6:57 AM, Oliver Garraux <oliver at g.garraux.net> wrote:

> So, I assume 6in4 tunnels like HE.net are included in the "native" percentage?
> 
> Oliver
> 
> -------------------------------------
> 
> Oliver Garraux
> Check out my blog:  www.GetSimpliciti.com/blog
> Follow me on Twitter:  twitter.com/olivergarraux
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:02 AM, William F. Maton Sotomayor
> <wmaton at ottix.net> wrote:
>> 
>> APNIC labs have an interesting set of numbers on IPv6 uptake as well.
>> 
>> http://labs.apnic.net/measureipv6/
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> 
>>> It is entirely possible that Google's numbers are artificially low for a
>>> number
>>> of reasons.
>>> 
>>> Owen
>>> 
>>> On Nov 20, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Aaron Toponce <aaron.toponce at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:14:18AM +0100, Tomas Podermanski wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>   It seems that today is a "big day" for IPv6. It is the very first
>>>>> time when native IPv6 on google statistics
>>>>> (http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html) reached 1%. Some
>>>>> might say it is tremendous success after 16 years of deploying IPv6 :-)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> And given the rate on that graph, we'll hit 2% before year-end 2013.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> . o .   o . o   . . o   o . .   . o .
>>>> . . o   . o o   o . o   . o o   . . o
>>>> o o o   . o .   . o o   o o .   o o o
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> wfms
>> 