Indonesian ISP Moratel announces Google's prefixes

Andrew Jones aj at jonesy.com.au
Wed Nov 7 04:55:49 UTC 2012


It's widely accepted that you only advertise your peers' routes to 
customers, and you only advertise your own, and your customers' routes 
to your upstreams.

On 07.11.2012 15:48, Jian Gu wrote:
> What do you mean hijack? Google is peering with Moratel, if Google 
> does not
> want Moratel to advertise its routes to Moratel's peers/upstreams, 
> then
> Google should've set the correct BGP attributes in the first place.
>
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Anurag Bhatia <me at anuragbhatia.com> 
> wrote:
>
>> Another case of route hijack -
>> 
>> http://blog.cloudflare.com/why-google-went-offline-today-and-a-bit-about
>>
>>
>>
>> I am curious if big networks have any pre-defined filters for big 
>> content
>> providers like Google to avoid these? I am sure internet community 
>> would be
>> working in direction to somehow prevent these issues. Curious to 
>> know
>> developments so far.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Anurag Bhatia
>> anuragbhatia.com
>>
>> Linkedin <http://in.linkedin.com/in/anuragbhatia21> |
>> Twitter<https://twitter.com/anurag_bhatia>|
>> Google+ <https://plus.google.com/118280168625121532854>
>>





More information about the NANOG mailing list