Common operational misconceptions

Paul Thornton prt at
Thu Feb 16 02:21:05 CST 2012

On 16/02/2012 07:45, Owen DeLong wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> On 2012.02.15 19:55, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
>>>> IPv6 is operational.
>>> How is this a misconception?  It works fine for me...
>> Imagine an operator who is v6 ignorant, with a home provider who implements v6 half-assed, and tries to access a v6 site that has perhaps v6-only accessible nameservers, when their provider who 'offers' v6 has resolvers that operate only over v4.
>> *huge* misconception about the operational status of IPv6 (imho).
>> Steve
> By that definition, IPv4 is non-operational.
> You can break anything if you try hard enough.

This being well demonstrated by most of the "Internet" access provided
by hotels, for example.


More information about the NANOG mailing list