Common operational misconceptions
owen at delong.com
Thu Feb 16 07:45:48 UTC 2012
On Feb 15, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> On 2012.02.15 19:55, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
>>> IPv6 is operational.
>> How is this a misconception? It works fine for me...
> Imagine an operator who is v6 ignorant, with a home provider who implements v6 half-assed, and tries to access a v6 site that has perhaps v6-only accessible nameservers, when their provider who 'offers' v6 has resolvers that operate only over v4.
> *huge* misconception about the operational status of IPv6 (imho).
By that definition, IPv4 is non-operational.
You can break anything if you try hard enough.
More information about the NANOG