Common operational misconceptions
steve.bertrand at gmail.com
Thu Feb 16 02:16:35 UTC 2012
On 2012.02.15 19:55, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
>> IPv6 is operational.
> How is this a misconception? It works fine for me...
Imagine an operator who is v6 ignorant, with a home provider who
implements v6 half-assed, and tries to access a v6 site that has perhaps
v6-only accessible nameservers, when their provider who 'offers' v6 has
resolvers that operate only over v4.
*huge* misconception about the operational status of IPv6 (imho).
More information about the NANOG