Why do some providers require IPv6 /64 PA space to have public whois?
I.Smith at F5.com
Mon Dec 10 22:53:42 UTC 2012
>Quite the opposite in fact. In IPv6 a /64 is roughly equivalent to a /32 in IPv4. As in, it's the smallest possible assignment that will allow an end-user host to >function under normal circumstances.
>SWIP or rwhois for a /64 seems excessive to me, FWIW.
IPv4/32 is both a routing endpoint and a host. IPv4 is a 32 bit combined routing and host space.
IPv6/64 is a routing endpoint and v6/128 is a host. IPv6 is a 64 bit routing space and also a 64 bit host space for each routing space, not a 128 bit combined routing and host space.
Evidently, the whois requirement is for networks, not nodes, which makes sense when you think about how the entity that controls a /64 is assuming responsibility for 2^64 network nodes.
From: Doug Barton [mailto:dougb at dougbarton.us]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 5:05 PM
To: Schiller, Heather A
Cc: Constantine A. Murenin; nanog at nanog.org
Subject: Re: Why do some providers require IPv6 /64 PA space to have public whois?
On 12/10/2012 01:27 PM, Schiller, Heather A wrote:
> I think most folks would agree that, IPv4 /32 :: IPv6 /128 as IPv4 /29
> :: IPv6 /64
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2793 / Virus Database: 2634/5946 - Release Date: 12/08/12
More information about the NANOG