US House to ITU: Hands off the Internet
dburk at burkov.aha.ru
Fri Aug 3 21:57:24 UTC 2012
I like your approach - simply no comments
I think the way as your legislation guys decided to follow can be absolutely wrong.
My opinion that the real problem laid in financial issues with developing countires and US native commercial interests that you (not you personally - of course) aimed to protect
All this discussion have only financial background - no more.
You can reference not only to magazines - but more on House of Representatives which expressed their opinions more openly.
On Aug 4, 2012, at 12:47 AM, John Curran wrote:
> On Aug 3, 2012, at 2:06 PM, "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick at ianai.net> wrote:
>> [Feels operational to me.]
>> The U.S. House of Representatives voted late Thursday to send a message to the United Nations' International Telecommunication Union that the Internet doesn't need new international regulations. The vote was unanimous: 414-0
>> Unanimous? I didn't think this congress could agree the earth is round unanimously.
> It is can be useful (particularly during an election year) to make
> certain that there is no doubt regarding the resolve of government
> with respect to positions being taken in international negotiations.
> In this case, I believe that the message is now quite clear...
> John Curran
> President and CEO
More information about the NANOG