Verizon Business - LTE?
Charles N Wyble
charles at knownelement.com
Sun Aug 14 10:30:56 CDT 2011
On 08/13/2011 12:54 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
> I was hoping to use LTE for a large number of sites we are about to
> roll out instead of DS1s. But looks like we will go down the TDM route.
Why is that?
I ran a nationwide network of digital signage systems with about 500 of
them being 3g (mix of Sprint and Verizon). Worked really well, except
for the PRL updates. For some reason the AT command set to do the update
didn't work. Never did get that figured out (was pulled off that project
to come up with a way to convert the systems from Fedora to Debian
without rolling a tech. I did get that project done. It was awesome).
Now that startup is pretty much defunct. Hmmm... that's an idea for
another thread (management of boxes that aren't in a colo).
> *From:*Cameron Byrne [mailto:cb.list6 at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, August 13, 2011 12:56 AM
> *To:* Ryan Finnesey
> *Cc:* nanog at nanog.org; Charles N Wyble
> *Subject:* RE: Verizon Business - LTE?
> On Aug 12, 2011 8:40 PM, "Ryan Finnesey" <rfinnesey at gmail.com
> <mailto:rfinnesey at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > Well they are two completely separate companies . I would think
> that the
> > LTE network would be a good replacement for DS1 type services.
> My guess is no.
> Yes, I bet vzw buys from vzb, but not the other way round. Whatever
> you call the vz LEC does not want to give 40 some cents on the dollar
> to Vodafone ... the other part of the vzw ownership.
> Not to mention that LTE is an IP service and ds1 is tdm...
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Charles N Wyble [mailto:charles at knownelement.com
> <mailto:charles at knownelement.com>]
> > Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 11:26 PM
> > To: nanog at nanog.org <mailto:nanog at nanog.org>
> > Subject: Re: Verizon Business - LTE?
> > On 08/12/2011 10:23 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
> > > Does anyone know if Verizon Business is using the Verizon Wireless LTE
> > > network to deliver service?
> > Who else would they use? I would presume they are eating their own
> dog food.
> > If not, that's very sad. :)
More information about the NANOG