Jumbo frame Question
wschultz at bsdboy.com
Thu Nov 25 18:33:29 CST 2010
This helps tons.
speedguide.net has some registry 'tweeks' for different versions of windows.
Also Win7 had the ability to turn on a FASTTCP type of congestion management called Compound TCP. I haven't tried the windows version so ymmv, but I have experienced great success by changing the congestion avoidance algorithm on other devices.
On Nov 25, 2010, at 4:19 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian at creative.net.au> wrote:
> TCP maximum window sizes.
> Application socket buffer sizes.
> Fix those and re-test!
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010, Harris Hui wrote:
>> Does anyone have experience on design / implementing the Jumbo frame
>> enabled network?
>> I am working on a project to better utilize a fiber link across east coast
>> and west coast with the Juniper devices.
>> Based on the default TCP windows in Linux / Windows and the latency between
>> east coast and west coast (~80ms) and the default MTU size 1500, the
>> maximum throughput of a single TCP session is around ~3Mbps but it is too
>> slow for us to backing-up the huge amount of data across 2 sites.
>> The following is the topology that we are using right now.
>> Host A NIC (MTU 9000) <--- GigLAN ---> (MTU 9216) Juniper EX4200 (MTU 9216)
>> <---GigLAN ---> (MTU 9018) J-6350 cluster A (MTU 9018) <--- fiber link
>> across site ---> (MTU 9018) J-6350 cluster B (MTU 9018) <--- GigLAN --->
>> (MTU 9216) Juniper EX4200 (MTU 9216) <---GigLAN ---> (MTU 9000) NIC - Host
>> I was trying to test the connectivity from Host A to the J-6350 cluster A
>> by using ICMP-Ping with size 8000 and DF bit set but it was failed to ping.
>> Does anyone have experience on it? please advise.
>> Thanks :-)
> - Xenion - http://www.xenion.com.au/ - VPS Hosting - Commercial Squid Support -
> - $24/pm+GST entry-level VPSes w/ capped bandwidth charges available in WA -
More information about the NANOG