ipv6 transit over tunneled connection

Christopher Morrow morrowc.lists at gmail.com
Fri May 14 19:44:10 UTC 2010

On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Seth Mattinen <sethm at rollernet.us> wrote:
> On 5/14/2010 11:49, Jared Mauch wrote:
>> I'm curious what providers have not gotten their IPv6 plans/networks/customer ports enabled.
>> I know that Comcast is doing their trials now (Thanks John!) and will be presenting at the upcoming NANOG about their experiences.
>> What parts of the big "I" Internet are not enabled or ready?
> Verizon has POPs that aren't IPv6 enabled making it a pain in the ass if
> you're closer to one of those (currently on month 11 of waiting, I'm
> just letting it go because I'm curious how long it'll take), Sprint
> isn't doing native IPv6 with their GSR's yet, Cogent's IPv6 visibility
> is poor, Level3 isn't accepting new IPv6 "beta" connections, and AT&T
> simply told me not available yet.
> Tunnels are still a necessity.

twt, ntt, gblx, telia all have presence in the US, and all do v6 to
customer links. vote with wallet.

More information about the NANOG mailing list