ipv6 transit over tunneled connection

Seth Mattinen sethm at rollernet.us
Fri May 14 22:49:37 UTC 2010

On 5/14/2010 12:44, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Seth Mattinen <sethm at rollernet.us> wrote:
>> On 5/14/2010 11:49, Jared Mauch wrote:
>>> I'm curious what providers have not gotten their IPv6 plans/networks/customer ports enabled.
>>> I know that Comcast is doing their trials now (Thanks John!) and will be presenting at the upcoming NANOG about their experiences.
>>> What parts of the big "I" Internet are not enabled or ready?
>> Verizon has POPs that aren't IPv6 enabled making it a pain in the ass if
>> you're closer to one of those (currently on month 11 of waiting, I'm
>> just letting it go because I'm curious how long it'll take), Sprint
>> isn't doing native IPv6 with their GSR's yet, Cogent's IPv6 visibility
>> is poor, Level3 isn't accepting new IPv6 "beta" connections, and AT&T
>> simply told me not available yet.
>> Tunnels are still a necessity.
> twt, ntt, gblx, telia all have presence in the US, and all do v6 to
> customer links. vote with wallet.

Yeah I hear that a lot, but out of those four the only one that will
serve my area is global crossing.


More information about the NANOG mailing list