IP4 Space

Steve Bertrand steve at ibctech.ca
Fri Mar 5 03:29:28 UTC 2010


On 2010.03.04 22:26, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> On 2010.03.04 16:53, William Herrin wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Stan Barber <sob at academ.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mar 4, 2010, at 1:30 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>>>> Because we expect far fewer end users to multihome tomorrow than do today?
>>>
>>> I would suggest that the ratio of folks that will multihome under IPv6
>>> versus those that won't will get smaller. I base that on an assumption that
>>> NAT (as we know it today) will be less prevalent as IPv6 usage grows.
>>
>> Alrighty then...
> 
> heh.
> 
> Stan, you've got things backwards, no matter which direction you are
> looking at things from. I'm thinking that you may have written the
> sentence incorrectly.
> 
> It's unfortunate, but it is reality.
> 
> Have you reviewed your RIR policy lately? v6 will be flying out the
> window soon, and your local RIR may be assigning PI space like candy.
> 
> Welcome IPv6.

fwiw, it didn't appear clear to me that my own comments reflected my
feelings that the migration was a good thing ;)

STeve




More information about the NANOG mailing list