IP Address Management Tool
pedro at whack.org
Tue Jun 1 13:45:31 CDT 2010
Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 6/1/10 9:22 AM, Justin Wilson wrote:
>> He has since reversed that stance and they are working on IPV6 support,
>> at least that is what I read somewhere. I don¹t blame the guy really. If
>> people want a feature they should pony up a little money. Otherwise it is
>> free software with no implied support.
> I feel that IPv6 should be a minimum requirement. At the time the author
> felt it should be an advanced paid-for feature. I treat commercial
> vendors the same way: no IPv6, no sale. That nastygram made me not want
> to donate (money or code) to IPplan. One shouldn't get into open source
> expecting money.
> The world moves forward and what is seen as a minimum requirement is
> eventually going to move with it.
didn't we just have this whole discussion three months ago?
that being said, IPv6 exists in the beta versions that are currently
More information about the NANOG