IP Address Management Tool

Peter Wohlers pedro at whack.org
Tue Jun 1 18:45:31 UTC 2010

Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 6/1/10 9:22 AM, Justin Wilson wrote:
>>     He has since reversed that stance and they are working on IPV6 support,
>> at least that is what I read somewhere.  I don¹t blame the guy really.  If
>> people want a feature they should pony up a little money.  Otherwise it is
>> free software with no implied support.
> I feel that IPv6 should be a minimum requirement. At the time the author
> felt it should be an advanced paid-for feature. I treat commercial
> vendors the same way: no IPv6, no sale. That nastygram made me not want
> to donate (money or code) to IPplan. One shouldn't get into open source
> expecting money.
> The world moves forward and what is seen as a minimum requirement is
> eventually going to move with it.
> ~Seth

didn't we just have this whole discussion three months ago?

that being said, IPv6 exists in the beta versions that are currently 


More information about the NANOG mailing list