Anyone see a game changer here?

Gadi Evron ge at
Sun Jan 24 13:59:25 UTC 2010

On 1/24/10 7:48 AM, Damian Menscher wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Gadi Evron<ge at>  wrote:
>> On 1/24/10 6:37 AM, Damian Menscher wrote:
>>> So... you're taking incomplete information hyped up by "tech"
>>> reporters operating based on leaks from people tangential to an
>>> investigation as fact, and deciding that if Google doesn't tell you
>>> the details of an ongoing criminal investigation that you'll assume
>>> they broke the law.
>> No. I write there's incomplete information, mention what possibly happened,
>> what alternatives exist, and ask for more data.
>> Yes, if Google did do it, I support the move.
>> Do you have new information to kill speculation, or should these "tech"
>> reporters keep at it?
> Nobody who knows anything is going to say anything, as this is an
> ongoing criminal investigation.  I'm afraid I'll have to leave you to
> your speculation.

Fair enough.

> Damian

Gadi Evron,
ge at


More information about the NANOG mailing list