Anyone see a game changer here?

Sun Jan 24 05:48:30 UTC 2010

On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Gadi Evron <ge at linuxbox.org> wrote:
> On 1/24/10 6:37 AM, Damian Menscher wrote:
>>
>> So... you're taking incomplete information hyped up by "tech"
>> reporters operating based on leaks from people tangential to an
>> investigation as fact, and deciding that if Google doesn't tell you
>> the details of an ongoing criminal investigation that you'll assume
>> they broke the law.
>
> No. I write there's incomplete information, mention what possibly happened,
> what alternatives exist, and ask for more data.
>
> Yes, if Google did do it, I support the move.
>
> Do you have new information to kill speculation, or should these "tech"
> reporters keep at it?

Nobody who knows anything is going to say anything, as this is an
ongoing criminal investigation.  I'm afraid I'll have to leave you to
your speculation.

Damian
-- 
Damian Menscher :: Security Reliability Engineer :: Google