Anyone see a game changer here?
damian at google.com
Sun Jan 24 05:48:30 UTC 2010
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Gadi Evron <ge at linuxbox.org> wrote:
> On 1/24/10 6:37 AM, Damian Menscher wrote:
>> So... you're taking incomplete information hyped up by "tech"
>> reporters operating based on leaks from people tangential to an
>> investigation as fact, and deciding that if Google doesn't tell you
>> the details of an ongoing criminal investigation that you'll assume
>> they broke the law.
> No. I write there's incomplete information, mention what possibly happened,
> what alternatives exist, and ask for more data.
> Yes, if Google did do it, I support the move.
> Do you have new information to kill speculation, or should these "tech"
> reporters keep at it?
Nobody who knows anything is going to say anything, as this is an
ongoing criminal investigation. I'm afraid I'll have to leave you to
Damian Menscher :: Security Reliability Engineer :: Google
More information about the NANOG