end-user ipv6 deployment and concerns about privacy

Mark Smith nanog at 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org
Fri Aug 20 09:58:06 CDT 2010


On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:30:07 +0200
Joakim Aronius <joakim at aronius.com> wrote:

> * Hannes Frederic Sowa (hannes at mailcolloid.de) wrote:
> > 
> > But most people just don't care. My proposal is to have some kind of
> > sane defaults for them e.g. changing their prefix every week or in the
> > case of a reconnect. This would mitigate some of the many privacy
> > concerns in the internet a little bit. Of course all the already known
> > problems would still exist. And still people have to care about the
> > technology to reach a higher level of anonymity.
> 
> Ok. Lets assume that the ISP hands out new prefixes to the clients CPE each week. The CPE then advertises these prefixes on the clients home network. For clients accessing the internet this works fine (except perhaps a glitch during the switchover). 
> 
> But what about the internal communication in the customer premises? How do they connect to their NAS, media players, printers, TVs etc? Of course there is UPnP, DLNA and different other kinds of magic but I imagine that most home users actually configure IP addresses at some point. 
> 
> Constantly changing prefixes will ad another layer of complexity, things will break, and customers will be upset. (and quite frankly I don't think that you would gain that much privacy anyway) 
> 

ULA - RFC4193.

(People really need to stop thinking in IPv4 mode when discussing
IPv6 ....)


> just my $.02
> 
> /Joakim
> 




More information about the NANOG mailing list