Question of privacy with reassigned resources

bmanning at bmanning at
Sat Aug 14 11:27:50 UTC 2010

On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 12:23:02PM +0100, Michael Dillon wrote:
> > Shall I go on? Regardless of what you may think about whether those
> > injured folks should be entitled to the information, the fact is that
> > they are entitled to it under ARIN policy developed based on public
> > consensus. Which means you injure them by denying it.
> Enough with the amateur lawyering!
> A minor inconvenience is NOT injury under the law.

	Pot, Kettle, Black.
	Thanks for that legal advice Michael.


More information about the NANOG mailing list