Google wants your Internet to be faster
zaid at zaidali.com
Mon Aug 9 19:18:12 UTC 2010
The devil is always in the details. The Network management piece is quite
glossed over and gives a different perception in the summary. You can't
perform the proposed network management piece without deep packet inspection
which violates every users privacy.
On 8/9/10 11:52 AM, "Joly MacFie" <joly at punkcast.com> wrote:
> Surely "differentiated services" could include a 'YouTube Channel' -
> something they deny in the call?
> I've blogged the proposal at http://www.isoc-ny.org/p2/?p=1112
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Jason Iannone <jason.iannone at gmail.com>wrote:
>> Pretty boiler plate pro net neutral. The transparency requirements
>> and 'differentiated services' exceptions are particularly interesting.
More information about the NANOG