Google wants your Internet to be faster

Mon Aug 9 19:29:46 UTC 2010

Nor ensure 'lawful' content

On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Zaid Ali <zaid at zaidali.com> wrote:

> The devil is always in the details. The Network management piece is quite
> glossed over and gives a different perception in the summary. You can't
> perform the proposed network management piece without deep packet
> inspection
> which violates every users privacy.
>
> Zaid
>
>
> On 8/9/10 11:52 AM, "Joly MacFie" <joly at punkcast.com> wrote:
>
> > Surely "differentiated services" could include a 'YouTube Channel' -
> > something they deny in the call?
> >
> > I've blogged the proposal at http://www.isoc-ny.org/p2/?p=1112
> >
> > j
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Jason Iannone <jason.iannone at gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2010/08/joint-policy-proposal-for-open
> >> -internet.html
> >>
> >> Pretty boiler plate pro net neutral.  The transparency requirements
> >> and 'differentiated services' exceptions are particularly interesting.
> >>
> >>
>
>
>

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
Joly MacFie  218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast
WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com
 http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
  Secretary - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org
---------------------------------------------------------------