Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses"
Mike Gazzerro
mike.gazzerro at nobistech.net
Mon Sep 21 17:18:30 UTC 2009
Matt Cutts, who works for Google, has iterated over and over that this is absolutely, positively, not the case and does not help page rank: http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-virtual-hosts-vs-dedicated-ip-addresses/
So there's an answer from someone at Google.
How do I answer such requests? I tell them they if they want to waste their money, that's what this service is for:
http://www.seohosting.com/
Regards,
Mike Gazzerro
www.ubiquityservers.com
866-438-8247 x 500
-----Original Message-----
From: Sebastian Wiesinger [mailto:nanog at ml.karotte.org]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 11:18 AM
To: NANOG
Subject: Google Pagerank and "Class-C Addresses"
Hello Nanog,
I'm looking into a weird request which more and more customers have.
They want "different Class C addresses", by which they mean IPs in
different /24 subnets.
The apparent reason for this is that Google will rank links from
different /24 higher then links from the same /24. So it's a SEO
thingy.
I googled a bit and found pages after pages of FUD and such great
things as the "Class C Checker": "This free Class C Checker tool
allows you to check if some sites are hosted on the same Class C IP
Range."
My question is: Is there any proof that Google does differentiate
between /24s, or even better is there any proof that this isn't the
case? I will not give a customer space from different address blocks
just because he read it in a SEO magazine.
Perhaps someone from Google itself can answer this question?
Also how do you handle such requests? I expect I'm not the only one
who gets them.
Regards,
Sebastian
--
New GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A 9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE)
Old GPG Key-ID: 0x76B79F20 (0x1B6034F476B79F20)
'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE SCYTHE.
-- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant
More information about the NANOG
mailing list