Suresh Ramasubramanian ops.lists at
Thu Jun 25 04:28:11 UTC 2009

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Adrian Chadd<adrian at> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>> Rod - you wouldnt qualify as an ISP - or even a "provider of an
>> interactive computer service" to go by the language in 47 USC 230, by
>> simply running a TOR exit node.
> Ah, but would an ISP which currently enjoys whatever the current definition
> of "common carrier" is these days, running a TOR node, still be covered by
> said provisions?

ISPs are not common carriers.  Geoff Huston is - as always - the guy
who explains it best.

Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists at

More information about the NANOG mailing list