tor

Adrian Chadd adrian at creative.net.au
Wed Jun 24 23:14:20 CDT 2009


On Thu, Jun 25, 2009, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Rod - you wouldnt qualify as an ISP - or even a "provider of an
> interactive computer service" to go by the language in 47 USC 230, by
> simply running a TOR exit node.

Ah, but would an ISP which currently enjoys whatever the current definition
of "common carrier" is these days, running a TOR node, still be covered by
said provisions?



Adrian





More information about the NANOG mailing list