Are we really this helpless? (Re: isprime DOS in progress)
sethm at rollernet.us
Fri Jan 23 20:05:43 CST 2009
Noel Butler wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-01-24 at 07:21, Chris McDonald wrote:
>> We [AS3491] null0'd the IP earlier. Rest-of-world encouraged to do the same :/
> Wrong approach, they are *innocent* in this as are the new targets.
> insert into your favourite acl:
> deny udp host 126.96.36.199 neq 53 any eq 53
> deny udp host 188.8.131.52 neq 53 any eq 53
> But it's much less work to add a filter on the name server as others
> have mentioned.
Having the world trying to keep up with ACL entries seems futile. Is
there really nothing to be done about this? (Yes, I know, BCP38, but
obviously the accomplice providers don't care.)
More information about the NANOG