IPv6 Confusion

TJ trejrco at gmail.com
Wed Feb 18 08:14:07 CST 2009


>> So we deploy v6 addresses to clients, and save the remaining v4 addresses
for servers. Problem solved?
>I have been suggesting that for a long time.
>
>However I am not suggesting IPv6-only to clients. See my other email on
this
>from a minute or so ago.
>
>The way I see things going in the medium term:
>* IPv4 SP-NAT
>* IPv6 native to clients


+1 

Wait, can I vote more than once?  
If so, +(more).


<<SNIP>>





More information about the NANOG mailing list