Is there anyone from ASPEWS on this list?

Kevin Stange kevin at steadfast.net
Tue Dec 15 12:43:33 CST 2009


On 12/15/2009 10:17 AM, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> Bill Weiss wrote:
>> Michelle Sullivan(matthew at sorbs.net)@Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:32:48AM
>> +0100:
>>  
>>>
>>> Then tell me where it says 3-5 hours and I'll correct the text.
>>>     
>>
>> On http://www.au.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/support , I read:
>> "This will route any created ticket to the robot handler which will
>> process and delist the netblock (upto /24) within a few hours"
>>
>> That says the robot will delist (not schedule to delist) "within a few
>> hours".
>>
>>   
> 
> Thank you, I wasn't aware, and it will be corrected (doesn't say
> 3-5hours still so I'd love to find that one).
> 

There is this text I see, which seems to disagree with the robot's
behavior in my case (from the Dynamic IP FAQ):

"The Regional Internet Registry (RIR) Point of Contact (PoC) can request
a listing or delisting of any address in their space. The only time this
will be refused is when the netblock information in the RIR or in the
reverse DNS naming clearly indicates the addresses are dynamically
assigned (e.g. 0.1.pool.example.com). "

I'm sending my request from our PoC and it's not taking my word for it
like is claimed here (since the reverse DNS certainly doesn't imply the
ranges are dynamic).  If you don't consider this part of the policy
anymore, you might want to clear that up in the FAQ.

-- 
Kevin Stange
Chief Technology Officer
Steadfast Networks
http://steadfast.net
Phone: 312-602-2689 ext. 203 | Fax: 312-602-2688 | Cell: 312-320-5867

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20091215/8ca33198/attachment.bin>


More information about the NANOG mailing list